Binding Financial Agreements

Finding financial agreements in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (FCFCOA) is like trying to decode your ex’s emotional texts: frustrating, legally binding, and absolutely not something you should do without a Solicitor.  

Financial agreements, also known as Binding Financial Agreements (BFAs), are basically prenuptial or postnuptial contracts, except with way more footnotes and the emotional spice of Schedule 1 of regret. They’re covered under Part VIIIA of the Family Law Act 1975 (for married folks) and Part VIIIAB for de facto relationships; because naturally, we needed two entire parts of legislation to explain how to split up your IKEA furniture. 

For married couples, the Family Law Act lets you make a financial agreement before, during, or after marriage. You can even whip one up while on your honeymoon if you’re feeling particularly romantic and full of distrust. These agreements must comply with sections 90B (before marriage), 90C (during marriage), and 90D (after divorce). For de facto couples, just to keep it spicy, we use sections 90UB, 90UC, and 90UD, respectively; because why use logical naming conventions when we can mimic Xbox gamer tags? 

Now, let’s talk about how BFAs differ from property consent orders, which are the beige slacks of the family law wardrobe. Consent orders go through the court and require approval to make sure they’re “just and equitable” – which is legalese for “are you two being ridiculous or is this actually fair?” BFAs, on the other hand, don’t need court approval but do require that both parties get independent legal advice and sign a certificate saying they understand what horrifying financial swamp they’re voluntarily stepping into. Basically: 

  1. consent orders are like having a referee during your break-up; and 
  2. BFAs are like signing a waiver before skydiving with your ex, and both of you are packing the other person’s parachute. 

And yes, the laws for married and de facto couples are nearly identical, but with some subtle differences. For example, you can’t just claim you were in a de facto relationship because you both liked the same Netflix shows. You need to prove a “genuine domestic basis,” which sounds like a fancy way to say you owned a NutriBullet together. The court might even look at the duration of the relationship, financial interdependence, and whether your families knew you were “a thing” before giving you access to the legal breakup buffet. 

So in summary, whether you’re married, de facto, or just romantically entangled with someone who refuses to Venmo you back, the FCFCOA provides several thrilling avenues to financially uncouple. Just remember: BFAs are contracts dressed in legal armor, consent orders wear the judge’s blessing like a tiara, and both are designed to keep you from spending your golden years fighting over a 2014 Hyundai i30. Either way, bring snacks and a Solicitor. You’ll need both. 

How does the process work?  First, both parties need to draft the agreement—usually with Solicitors involved unless you’re into financial masochism. Then, and this is crucial (like, section-90G-of-the-Family-Law-Act crucial), each party must get independent legal advice from an actual, qualified Solicitor (and not your cousin who once watched Suits). The Solicitors must sign certificates saying they gave said advice, and those certificates get attached to the agreement like a sad little appendix. If you skip this step, the agreement is about as legally binding as a pinky swear.  

Then, after all the signatures and mutual side-eyes are exchanged, the document becomes enforceable. That’s it. No court filing, no judges, we just quietly agree that if the relationship explodes, we’ll follow this very serious document we made while still pretending to like each other. 

Deciding between a Consent Order and a Binding Financial Agreement (BFA) is like choosing between a courtroom marriage counselor and a do-it-yourself heartbreak contract. If you want the court to give your split the ol’ “just and equitable” seal of approval (like a divine thumbs-up from the Family Law gods) then a Consent Order is your jam. It’s cleaner, safer, and generally harder to challenge later unless someone hid a yacht or forgot to disclose their Bitcoin stash.  

BFAs, on the other hand, are more flexible and private, which is ideal if you and your ex are still civil and don’t want to involve a judge or you’re paranoid and want to lock things down before a wedding, during a midlife crisis, or just after you bought a house together and started arguing about grout color. The downside? BFAs can be overturned if not done exactly right, or if one of you claims they were coerced, confused, or concussed at the time of signing.  

So basically, Consent Orders are the court’s version of couples therapy, and BFAs are like signing a prenup while holding a Solicitor in each hand and whispering, “We trust each other, but just in case…” 

At Transitional, we hold your trembling hand (figuratively, we’re not creeps) through the minefield of family law, whether you’re chasing a Consent Order or ready to slap your name on a Binding Financial Agreement like it’s a Black Friday deal. We translate all that legal gobbledygook into actual human language, draft the documents without the passive-aggressive subtext, and make sure everything is air-tight, above board, and won’t spontaneously combust in court later. We’ll also coordinate with Solicitors to tick off all those Family Law Act boxes (yes, even the soul-draining ones like independent legal advice certificates), and we do it without judging your life choices… mostly. So whether you’re nesting, splitting, or just planning your escape route with spreadsheets and emotional detachment, Transitional Legal helps you do it with legal precision and a lot less chaos. 

Want to know more about Private Protection Orders?

Give us a call today.
24/7 Urgent Legal Hotline